Suzuki GSXR Forum banner

1 - 5 of 5 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,527 Posts
What’s the issue? Law is changed to force motorcyclists to have a minimum of 3rd party liability insurance- makes sense to me. I think cyclists should be forced to do the same too. Seen to many Lycra clad idiots scrape cars in heavy traffic.

Personally I wouldn’t ride or drive without comprehensive cover.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2 Posts
Discussion Starter #4
I 100% agree with the cyclists need insurance haha especially if motorbike are required also they need to pay road taxes..
I just thought it was odd i didnt hear a thing about it until its about passed through. I mean wheres my vote.
And what about those who have more than one motorcycle.
And im not saying its a bad thing just feels like we are getting scammed and didnt get a say in it
And i didnt really believe it at first
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
8,554 Posts
I think cyclists should be forced to do the same too.
In the U.S., the liability section of the cyclist's homeowners or renters policy will respond. I've never seen an exclusion.
 
1 - 5 of 5 Posts
Top